Monday, October 29, 2007

Oh Yeah, And Buy Wheat Futures Too


“The number of hectares devoted to wheat farming has been declining for 30 years,” Jim Rogers also said in his Bloomberg interview. “The inventory levels of food are at the lowest level since 1972.
“Suppose we start having droughts again. God knows how high the price of agriculture is going to go, so that's where I'm putting more of my money now than in other things… I think I'm going to make more money in agriculture than I make in precious metals.''

Loonie Fever! Hope You Caught It Here First!


The loonie soared over a cent and a half yesterday. Canadian dollars traded as high as $1.039… a new 33-year high. The loonie managed this massive gain without oil’s help, which fell over $1 during the same period.
The Aussie dollar also made impressive gains overnight. The Aussie rose a solid half a cent on news that inflation was rising in Australia faster than expected… and thus a rate hike would be more likely at the Aussie central bank’s November meeting.
If you’re holding one of EverBank’s World Energy CDs , this is all good news. These unique CDs chart the movement of four energy-reliant currencies -- the loonie, Aussie, pound and krone. And given the dollar’s performance of late, they still look like a good place to park your cash.

For An Unabashed Egomaniac, He's On Top Of Things


“I think the credit situation is worse than anybody realizes,” said Julian Robertson on CNBC.
Robertson’s a bit of a legend. In 1980, he started his Tiger Management fund with $8 million… and grew it 875 fold into $7 billion over the next 16 years. He then closed it when he ceased to understand valuations on Wall Street during the tech boom… and bust.
Now he’s sounding the alarm for the economy at large. “I think we’re going to have a doozy of a recession,” he predicted. “The Federal Reserve and our government will trash the dollar until such times as there is some turnaround in the economy or until they realize that this policy is self-defeating.”
You can watch the whole Robertson interview here.

When Jim Rogers Moves Like This, Press The Panic Button


“I'm in the process of -- I hope in the next few months -- getting all of my assets out of the dollar,” Jim Rogers told Bloomberg yesterday. “I'm that pessimistic about what's happening in the U.S.''
The yuan is “the best currency to buy right now,” Rogers said. “I don't see how one can really lose on the renminbi in the next decade or so. It's gotta go. It's gotta triple. It's gotta quadruple.”
The dollar is just about the worst performing currency this year. Of the 16 actively traded currencies, only the Mexican peso has fared worse in 2007.
“It's the official policy of the central bank and the U.S. to debase the currency,'' said Rogers, “The U.S. dollar is and has been the world's reserve currency, the world's medium of exchange… That's in the process of changing. “The pound sterling, which used to be the world's reserve currency, lost 80% of its value, top to bottom, as it went through the whole period of losing its status as the world's reserve currency.''

Hey Big Spender!


“George W. Bush, despite all his recent bravado about being an apostle of small government and budget slashing, is the biggest spending president since Lyndon B. Johnson,” write the McClatchy papers this morning.
Citing a recent Cato Institute report, the paper reinforces our long-standing opinion that, when it comes to spending, our president is far from “conservative.” Aside from the chart above, here are the highlights: - Discretionary spending soared in Bush's first term by 48%, not adjusted for inflation, more than twice as much as Bill Clinton spent (21.6%) in two terms
- Defense spending under Bush has grown an average of 5.7% a year, compared with LBJ’s 4.9% (adjusted for inflation)
- Homeland security spending was up to about $31 billion last year, three times the pre-Sept. 11 number
- Education spending is up, adjusted for inflation, 18% annually since 2001
- The 2002 farm bill caused agri-spending to double from 1990s levels. - “Then there was the 2003 Medicare prescription drug benefit — the biggest single expansion in the program’s history — whose 10-year costs are estimated at more than $700 billion” said the paper.
“He’s a big government guy,” said Stephen Slivinski, director of budget studies at Cato Institute. “He has presided over massive increases in almost every category… a dramatic change of pace from most previous presidents.”

Stupidity Grows In Earnest


Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest By Bill Bonner
Central banks provide about the same social function as a distillery. They lift up moods and lower I.Qs. They increase liquidity and dry up brain cells. As long as the easy credit flows, people feel lucky. But the longer the lucky streak lasts, the dumber people get.
From the buckle of America's snow-belt comes proof:
Earlier this week, we passed along this report from the N.Y. TIMES:
"By 10 a.m. Saturday, more than 700 people filled a hall in the convention center here for what real estate agents say is the largest auction of foreclosed properties ever in Minnesota… the crowd was standing-room only, with more waiting to enter."
Housing prices in the US are falling nationwide for the first time since the Great Depression. Prices are just beginning to fall in Britain, Ireland and Spain too. But in the minds of most house buyers, it is still a bull market. They have lived with rising prices for so long they can't imagine anything else.
"The market's really low right now, so you can get a good price," said one buyer, a waitress who was not looking for a place to live, but a place she could fix up and sell. "Even if you can't sell it right away, if you just sit on it and sit on it, it will go up."
What has happened? The world's luckiest people seem have drawn the wrong conclusions; the wit seems to have gone out of them. They take even the smallest downturn for a buying opportunity. Still no recession; property prices down less than 10%; stocks near an all-time high; officials say the worst is over – and they believe them!
Down here in the sunny Argentine it is a different story. While creditors compete for a chance to lend money to English speakers, who bothers to offer credit south of the Rio Plata? Lenders down here have gotten smart; they ask questions. They know how fast money can move. They wonder if they'll ever get it back…and what it will be worth when it returns.
The biggest financial innovation of the last half a century occurred on August 15th, 1971. That was the year that the US government put wheels on the US dollar; henceforth, it was 100% gold-free. It could go wherever it wanted.
We put it to you today that that event caused more stupidity than television. With their old rides pimped up with these new, post-'71 dollars, Americans took to the financial highways…and ended up in places they'd never been before. Now, they've seen almost everything -- from the treacherous swamps of sub-prime ARMs, which were used to sell houses to people with no money… to soaring skyscrapers of securitized debt, based on mortgage contracts with no real security in them…to a Mt. Saint Helens at home (an $800 billion US current account deficit)… to the Vesuviuses and Krakatoas of foreign exchange reserves piling up overseas (in the last 4 years, $2.8 trillion has been added– more than in the entire prior history of the United States of America.)
You'd think they would have learned something. Instead, it is as if they – and the entire rest of the world, too – got home, pulled into the garage, closed the garage door, revved up their dollar-fueled motors, and breathed deeply. Pretty soon, they could barely find their car keys, let alone put two and two together.
In Venezuela, Russia and Iran – for example -- higher oil prices bring lower public policies. Hugo Chavez would probably have been out of office by now – a coup in 2002 nearly sent him into retirement in Cuba – had it not been for the rising price of petroleum. In Russia, Vladimir Putin seemed to be on the right track when he got into office. Russia's low cost labor and flat, 13% tax rate, brought about a boom. But then, when oil became dear, property rights became cheap. Now, Putin is using his control of energy resources as a stick to beat up everyone on the supply line. And in Iran too, high oil prices work like foreign aid – helping to keep incompetents in power and dumb policies in place.
In Bolivia, rather than put its gas on the world market, Trotsky admirer Evo Morales proposes to build a pipeline over the Andes, 1,500 km long, in order to sell it to the Argentines. The Argentine national energy company, meanwhile, buys the gas at something close to world prices…and sells it to voters for half as much.
In China…anyone who still believes that prosperity and democracy go hand in hand ought to take a look. Despite the biggest economic boom in the history of mankind, the country is still run by communists. Their economic strategy consists of trying to sell more product to consumers in the West who don't need the stuff and can't really afford to pay for it.
In America, judged on the evidence above, the quarter century long credit binge must have killed off more brain cells than a presidential address. And in Britain, the yeoman householder is as dim as his American cousin; he thinks he's going to get rich by grabbing buy-to-let properties at cap rates lower than LIBOR!
Meanwhile, high commodity prices retard the learning process even here in Argentina. The wife of current president Nestor Kirchner is expected to win an easy victory on Sunday, not because of her proposals or policies, but because she's not making any. Instead, "soybeans, wheat and corn are doing the talking," says colleague Paola Pecora. High commodity prices make Argentines feel lucky too. (Si se habla castellano, lea su comentario a MoneyweekES.com)
But Argentines haven't had such a long run of good luck as the rest of us. Their wits are not yet as dull.
"Don't trust anything the government tells you," said a local cab driver. "They're all liars. Most of them lie about half the time. If they have an Italian surname, they lie 75% of the time. And if they're talking about the economy, they're lying 100% of the time."

"Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society,"

"Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society," claims a reader. "They're like dues to a country club. The price of admission. If we are to have common goods -- roads, national parks, a social safety net, public education or a war (which I oppose) -- all have to be paid for. Rangel's approach to reduce taxes on the majority of people while restoring the tax rates to the richest among us seems to me to be a good plan. Those of us who are fortunate enough to do well in this society have an obligation to pay our fair share.
"Would I change some of the places the money is spent? Of course. But I am happy to pay for the privilege of living in the U.S., though I hate the hassle and the paperwork."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sound Of Cannons can't figure out which of your letters is more offensive or ignorant. You both have the idea exactly ass-backwards: Taxes are the price we pay for our FAILURE to be civilized. We do not exist to serve the government, but the other way around. If we want common goods, we should be civilized enough to provide them. But being civilized requires people to act. Most people would rather have the government do their dirty work. Consequently, we have the most asinine and labyrinthine tax code history has ever seen.
Besides, Rangel's approach is just not smart. His theory of government requires you to punish people for being successful and to extract what he perceives to be someone else's "fair" share at the point of a gun. It's not likely to be a very popular plan. And he'll have to make all kinds of concessions to get it passed. Hence the fetid pit of corruption Congress has become.
The Republicans in office are much more clever: They understand power. They spend money whenever they want -- and do whatever they want with it -- without asking anyone's permission... and stick the bill on future generations. If you question them, they tie you up in court. It's much easier. Those voters who'll have to pay for their plans haven't been born yet. They don't complain as much.