North American Union becomes litmus test for political hypocrisy among U.S. Democratic Presidential candidates
Peter TremblayThe Canadian Friday January 25, 2008
Many Americans who seek to consider which candidate to vote for in upcoming Democratic Party Primaries may wonder which front runner candidate can they trust to best represent the expressed political party values: Hillary Clinton, John Edward or Barack Obama? These values and related policy agenda supposedly include defending America's "middle class'; affirming labour and equality rights; increasing accessibility to healthcare insurance with other social issues; protecting America's natural environmental heritage; redressing Global Warming; and getting America out of the costly Iraq War, which would free up needed public resources for domestic economic recovery. All the Democratic frontrunners have been very eloquent about their professed commitments. However, there is one critical issue, which exposes all of them to be apparent lying hypocrites.
That critical issue is that of the so-called Security and Prosperity Partnership North American Union (SPP-NAU). The U.S. President George W. Bush Administration's SPP-NAU agenda, would literally undermine and subvert the kind of values and related policy areas that Democratic Presidential candidates have professed to support. The silence of the Democratic Presidential candidates on the SPP-NAU, demonstrates a complete lack of integrity and disingenuousness. The failure of Democratic Presidential candidates to confront the Bush Administration's SPP-NAU agenda demonstrates that these candidates opposition to the Bush Administration, is merely political theatre, directed at a "gullible" American public.
(Article continues below)
The apparent truth of the matter is that Democratic Party Presidential candidates, who are all engaged in a conspiracy of silence over the SPP-NAU, along with Mr. Bush, and most of the Republican Party Presidential candidates are little more than different faces of the same malevolent consciousness whose members are working in concert with one another behind the scenes.
The apparent political conflict with one another, is no more real than the conflict that one can find in the typical American production of a Hollywood film.
Americans who seek a better quality-of-life, need to be guided by action, and not simply political rhetoric. Silence, as the action of U.S. Democratic Presidential candidates on a Bush administration effort, conveys a Democratic Presidential strategy of co-operating in a political charade against the American people.
The conspiracy of silence among Democratic Presidential candidates is far more hypocritical than the Republic Presidential candidates, because the "credibility gap" among supposedly more progressive Democrats is far worse. Silence by a Republican candidates like John McCain and his other political party Republican Primary candidates, with their biases toward Big Business interests makes them less hypocritical. This is because these candidates are members of a political party, that unapologetically represents the kind of Big Business biases that SPP-NAU agenda is designed to advance.
Respective political party elites, in collusion with the U.S. political-military-industrial complex in both the Democratic and Republican Parties, through a greed-driven political process that relies on "big bucks", have ensured that any successful candidate running for President of the United States, will represent the core values of a neo-fascist agenda. U.S. President George W. Bush and his current White House colleagues, are just a relative handful of representatives of a well organized "bureaucracy" of related political interests.
Republican Ron Paul is the only Presidential candidate to publicly take on the issue of the SPP-NAU agenda, in association with Congressman Virgil Goode.
Mr. Goode (R-VA), had introduced H.C.R. 40 in January 2007, which presented the acknowledged the real threat which the NAU agenda presents:
"Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada."
H.C.R. 40 has over forty co-sponsors who include: Rep. John J. Duncan (TN-2), Rep. Virginia Foxx (NC-5), Rep. Walter B. Jones (NC-3), Rep. Charles W. Norwood (GA-10), Rep. Ron Paul (TX-14), Rep Ralph Regula (OH-16), Rep. Jim Saxton (NJ-3), Rep. Cliff Stearns (FL-6), Rep. Patrick J. Tiberi (OH-12), Rep Zach Wamp (TN-3). LINK
Mr. Goode's efforts have acknowledged that, behind closed doors, a new scheme is being drawn up to eliminate the borders with Mexico and Canada, replace the Dollar with the "Amero" -- thus destroying American's savings and economic stability; and create a "North American Union" (NAU) like the anti-democratic European Union.
This scheme has been identified as replacing decision making through democratic institutions instead with government under the direction of "directorship" of large corporations and non-elected "advisors" in Mexico, Canada, and the United States. The U.S. political-industrial-military complex, and its Canadian and Mexican allies seek to replace the democracies of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico with a "North American Union" entity that operates as a "national security state".
The SPP-NAU agenda, had also been acknowledged in Canada by the CanWest Global owned Ottawa Citizen, in the article entitled North American Union' plan under fire, that had been published in February 17, 2007. LINK. CanWest Global is a multi-billion dollar media enterprise in Canada, which includes newspapers across Canada and a network of cable television stations.
That article by a well established media organization further emphasises that Americans need to wake up to the fact that Democratic Party Presidential candidates professings of seeking to present Americans with a "new course" away from the self-serving agendas of the U.S. Bush Administration, are statements that are being presented with hypocrisy of the worst kind. Americans as a whole, need to wake up also to the apparent fact that the clandestine elite neo-fascist inspired agenda of SPP-NAU demonstrates that its society's leaders professings about championing democracy in the execution of the "War on Terror" is total mass-deception.
The SPP-NAU, is an effort by the U.S. Bush administration to ensure that whatever is the outcome of the U.S. Presidential election, their clique will rule "North America", toward aspirations of neo-fascist authoritarian Global dominance. SPP-NAU represents the creation of a North American "national security state" under One Party Rule, that will make the Office of the President, along with Congressional representatives, ceremonial positions, like Queen and the Royal Palace in the United Kingdom.
The SPP-NAU agenda is an apparent effort to concentrate global power, in an alliance with the Big Business elites of the neo-fascistic European Union, in a march toward the consolidation of an Orwellian-like "New World Order", where the kind of values fought by great former champions of the Democratic Party like Robert Sargent Shriver, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Robert F. Kennedy, will be totally disregarded, in favour of an agenda of exploitation and oppression under an unaccountable neo-fascist clique.
Peter TremblayThe Canadian Friday January 25, 2008
Many Americans who seek to consider which candidate to vote for in upcoming Democratic Party Primaries may wonder which front runner candidate can they trust to best represent the expressed political party values: Hillary Clinton, John Edward or Barack Obama? These values and related policy agenda supposedly include defending America's "middle class'; affirming labour and equality rights; increasing accessibility to healthcare insurance with other social issues; protecting America's natural environmental heritage; redressing Global Warming; and getting America out of the costly Iraq War, which would free up needed public resources for domestic economic recovery. All the Democratic frontrunners have been very eloquent about their professed commitments. However, there is one critical issue, which exposes all of them to be apparent lying hypocrites.
That critical issue is that of the so-called Security and Prosperity Partnership North American Union (SPP-NAU). The U.S. President George W. Bush Administration's SPP-NAU agenda, would literally undermine and subvert the kind of values and related policy areas that Democratic Presidential candidates have professed to support. The silence of the Democratic Presidential candidates on the SPP-NAU, demonstrates a complete lack of integrity and disingenuousness. The failure of Democratic Presidential candidates to confront the Bush Administration's SPP-NAU agenda demonstrates that these candidates opposition to the Bush Administration, is merely political theatre, directed at a "gullible" American public.
(Article continues below)
The apparent truth of the matter is that Democratic Party Presidential candidates, who are all engaged in a conspiracy of silence over the SPP-NAU, along with Mr. Bush, and most of the Republican Party Presidential candidates are little more than different faces of the same malevolent consciousness whose members are working in concert with one another behind the scenes.
The apparent political conflict with one another, is no more real than the conflict that one can find in the typical American production of a Hollywood film.
Americans who seek a better quality-of-life, need to be guided by action, and not simply political rhetoric. Silence, as the action of U.S. Democratic Presidential candidates on a Bush administration effort, conveys a Democratic Presidential strategy of co-operating in a political charade against the American people.
The conspiracy of silence among Democratic Presidential candidates is far more hypocritical than the Republic Presidential candidates, because the "credibility gap" among supposedly more progressive Democrats is far worse. Silence by a Republican candidates like John McCain and his other political party Republican Primary candidates, with their biases toward Big Business interests makes them less hypocritical. This is because these candidates are members of a political party, that unapologetically represents the kind of Big Business biases that SPP-NAU agenda is designed to advance.
Respective political party elites, in collusion with the U.S. political-military-industrial complex in both the Democratic and Republican Parties, through a greed-driven political process that relies on "big bucks", have ensured that any successful candidate running for President of the United States, will represent the core values of a neo-fascist agenda. U.S. President George W. Bush and his current White House colleagues, are just a relative handful of representatives of a well organized "bureaucracy" of related political interests.
Republican Ron Paul is the only Presidential candidate to publicly take on the issue of the SPP-NAU agenda, in association with Congressman Virgil Goode.
Mr. Goode (R-VA), had introduced H.C.R. 40 in January 2007, which presented the acknowledged the real threat which the NAU agenda presents:
"Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada."
H.C.R. 40 has over forty co-sponsors who include: Rep. John J. Duncan (TN-2), Rep. Virginia Foxx (NC-5), Rep. Walter B. Jones (NC-3), Rep. Charles W. Norwood (GA-10), Rep. Ron Paul (TX-14), Rep Ralph Regula (OH-16), Rep. Jim Saxton (NJ-3), Rep. Cliff Stearns (FL-6), Rep. Patrick J. Tiberi (OH-12), Rep Zach Wamp (TN-3). LINK
Mr. Goode's efforts have acknowledged that, behind closed doors, a new scheme is being drawn up to eliminate the borders with Mexico and Canada, replace the Dollar with the "Amero" -- thus destroying American's savings and economic stability; and create a "North American Union" (NAU) like the anti-democratic European Union.
This scheme has been identified as replacing decision making through democratic institutions instead with government under the direction of "directorship" of large corporations and non-elected "advisors" in Mexico, Canada, and the United States. The U.S. political-industrial-military complex, and its Canadian and Mexican allies seek to replace the democracies of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico with a "North American Union" entity that operates as a "national security state".
The SPP-NAU agenda, had also been acknowledged in Canada by the CanWest Global owned Ottawa Citizen, in the article entitled North American Union' plan under fire, that had been published in February 17, 2007. LINK. CanWest Global is a multi-billion dollar media enterprise in Canada, which includes newspapers across Canada and a network of cable television stations.
That article by a well established media organization further emphasises that Americans need to wake up to the fact that Democratic Party Presidential candidates professings of seeking to present Americans with a "new course" away from the self-serving agendas of the U.S. Bush Administration, are statements that are being presented with hypocrisy of the worst kind. Americans as a whole, need to wake up also to the apparent fact that the clandestine elite neo-fascist inspired agenda of SPP-NAU demonstrates that its society's leaders professings about championing democracy in the execution of the "War on Terror" is total mass-deception.
The SPP-NAU, is an effort by the U.S. Bush administration to ensure that whatever is the outcome of the U.S. Presidential election, their clique will rule "North America", toward aspirations of neo-fascist authoritarian Global dominance. SPP-NAU represents the creation of a North American "national security state" under One Party Rule, that will make the Office of the President, along with Congressional representatives, ceremonial positions, like Queen and the Royal Palace in the United Kingdom.
The SPP-NAU agenda is an apparent effort to concentrate global power, in an alliance with the Big Business elites of the neo-fascistic European Union, in a march toward the consolidation of an Orwellian-like "New World Order", where the kind of values fought by great former champions of the Democratic Party like Robert Sargent Shriver, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Robert F. Kennedy, will be totally disregarded, in favour of an agenda of exploitation and oppression under an unaccountable neo-fascist clique.
No comments:
Post a Comment